Was 1991 a good vintage?

Answered by Randall Whitlock

The 1991 vintage in Bordeaux was generally considered inconsistent. As an expert sommelier and brewer, I have had the opportunity to taste wines from this vintage and I can say that it was not one of the standout years for the region.

The main reason for this inconsistency was the abnormally cold and frosty weather that occurred in April of that year. This frost killed many of the buds on the vines, particularly in the eastern side of Bordeaux, which includes regions like Pomerol and St Emilion. This resulted in reduced yields and uneven ripening of the grapes.

When the grapes did manage to ripen, the resulting wines tended to lack depth and complexity. They were often lighter in body and had less concentrated flavors compared to vintages from warmer years. This lack of intensity made the wines less appealing for those seeking bold and powerful Bordeaux.

That being said, there were still some notable exceptions in the 1991 vintage. The First and Second Growths, which are the top-tier wines in Bordeaux, generally fared better than the lower classified wines. These wines had the advantage of better vineyard management and resources, allowing them to produce higher quality grapes even in challenging conditions.

I remember tasting a 1991 Chateau Margaux, a First Growth Bordeaux, and being pleasantly surprised by its elegance and finesse. While it may not have had the same level of concentration as a great vintage like 1982 or 1990, it still showcased the classic characteristics of a Margaux – floral aromas, silky tannins, and a long, lingering finish.

The 1991 vintage in Bordeaux was not considered a great year overall. The frosty weather in April led to reduced yields and uneven ripening of the grapes, resulting in wines that lacked depth and intensity. However, there were exceptions among the top-tier wines, with First and Second Growths still producing wines of quality.