As an expert sommelier and brewer, I have had the opportunity to taste and analyze both the Cristal 2012 and 2013 vintages. These two releases are quite different from each other, with distinct characteristics that set them apart.
The first notable difference is in the weather conditions of the respective years. 2012 was a warmer vintage overall, resulting in riper and more fruit-forward wines. The 2012 Cristal showcases a rich and opulent fruit profile, with luscious flavors of ripe stone fruits like peach and apricot, as well as tropical notes of pineapple and mango. The warmer temperatures of 2012 also contributed to a fuller body and rounder texture in the wine.
On the other hand, 2013 was a slightly cooler vintage, which influenced the style and character of the wine. The 2013 Cristal has a more elegant and focused profile, with a greater emphasis on freshness and precision. The cooler temperatures preserved the natural acidity of the grapes, giving the wine a vibrant and lively character. The fruit flavors in the 2013 Cristal are more citrus-driven, with zesty notes of lemon and grapefruit, as well as hints of green apple and pear.
In terms of texture, the 2012 Cristal has a more voluptuous and creamy mouthfeel, thanks to its riper fruit and warmer vintage. The 2013 Cristal, on the other hand, has a lighter and more linear texture, with a refreshing acidity that gives it a crisp and energetic quality.
Another important difference between these two vintages is the biodynamic approach taken in the production of the 2012 and 2013 Cristal. Biodynamic farming practices aim to enhance the health and vitality of the vineyard ecosystem, resulting in wines that are more expressive of their terroir. While both vintages were produced using biodynamic methods, the specific conditions of each year influenced the expression of the wines.
In terms of aging potential, both the 2012 and 2013 Cristal vintages have the potential to age gracefully. However, due to its riper fruit and fuller body, the 2012 Cristal may have a slightly longer aging potential, while the 2013 Cristal is likely to be more approachable in its youth.
The differences between Cristal 2012 and 2013 can be attributed to the contrasting weather conditions of each vintage. The 2012 is a warmer and more fruit-forward release, with a richer and rounder profile. In contrast, the 2013 is a cooler and more focused vintage, with a vibrant and refreshing character. Both vintages showcase the unique expression of the biodynamic approach, adding complexity and depth to these exceptional Champagnes.